Scientific publications

Book chapters

  1. Derreumaux, Y., Bergh, R., Lindskog, M. & Hughes, B. (2023). Group-Motivated Sampling: From Skewed Experiences to Biased Evaluations. In P. Juslin, K. Fiedler, & J. Denrell (Eds.), Sampling in Judgment and Decision Making. (pp. 417–434). (2023). Cambridge University press.

Journal articles

  1. Gerbrand, A., Gredebäck G. & Lindskog, M. (2023) Recognition of small numbers in subset knowers Cardinal knowledge in early childhood. Royal Society Open Science, 10:230474. (.PDF)

  2. Gredebäck, G., Lindskog, M. & Hall, J. (in press). Poor maternal mental health is associated with a low degree of proactive control in refugee children. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. (.PDF)

  3. Rawlings, A. M., Niemivirta, M., Korhonen, J., Lindskog, M., Tuominen, H., & Mononen, R. (2023). Achievement emotions and arithmetic fluency–Development and parallel processes during the early school years. Learning and Instruction, 86, 101776.(.PDF)

  4. Tu, H. F., Lindskog, M., & Gredebäck, G. (2022). Attentional control is a stable construct in infancy but not steadily linked with self-regulatory functions in toddlerhood. Developmental Psychology, 58(7), 1221.(.PDF)

  5. Throndsen, T. U., Lindskog, M., Niemivirta, M., & Mononen, R. (2022). Does mathematics anxiety moderate the effect of problem difficulty on cognitive effort?. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 63(6), 601-608.(.PDF)

  6. Gredebäck, G., Hall, J., & Lindskog, M. (2022). Fluid intelligence in refugee children. A cross-sectional study of potential risk and resilience factors among Syrian refugee children and their parents. Intelligence, 94, 101684.(.PDF)

  7. Viktorsson, C., Lindskog, M., Li, D., Tammimies, K., Taylor, M. J., Ronald, A., & Falck‐Ytter, T. (2022). Infants’ sense of approximate numerosity: Heritability and link to other concurrent traits. Developmental Science, e13347.(.PDF)

  8. Peltonen, K., Gredebäck, G., Pollak, S. D., Lindskog, M., & Hall, J. (2022). The role of maternal trauma and discipline types in emotional processing among Syrian refugee children. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 1-9.(.PDF)

  9. Gerbrand, A., Gredebäck, G., Hedenius, M., Forsman, L., & Lindskog, M. (2022). Statistical learning in infancy predicts vocabulary size in toddlerhood. Infancy, 27(4), 700-719.(.PDF)

  10. Astor, K., Lindskog, M., Juvrud, J., Namgyel, S. C., Wangmo, T., Tshering, K., & Gredebäck, G. (2022). Maternal postpartum depression impacts infants’ joint attention differentially across cultures. Developmental psychology. doi:10.1037/dev0001413.(.PDF)

  11. Tu, H.-F., Skalkidou, A., Lindskog, M., & Gredebäck, G. (2021). Maternal childhood trauma and perinatal distress are related to infants’ focused attention from 6 to 18 months. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 24190. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-03568-2 (.PDF)

  12. Schröder, E., Gredebäck, G., Forssman, L., & Lindskog, M. (2021). Predicting children’s emerging understanding of numbers. Developmental Science, e13207. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.13207 (.PDF)

  13. Mononen, R., Niemivirta, M., Korhonen, J., Lindskog, M., & Tapola, A. (2021). Developmental relations between mathematics anxiety, symbolic numerical magnitude processing and arithmetic skills from first to second grade. Cognition and Emotion, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2021.2015296 (.PDF)

  14. Lindskog, M., Poom, L., & Winman, A. (2021). Attentional bias induced by stimulus control (ABC) impairs measures of the approximate number system. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 83(4), 1684–1698. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-020-02229-2 (.PDF)

  15. Lindskog, M., Nyström, P., & Gredebäck, G. (2021). Can the Brain Build Probability Distributions? Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 596231. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.596231 (.PDF)

  16. Juvrud, J., Haas, S. A., Lindskog, M., Astor, K., Namgyel, S. C., Wangmo, T., Wangchuk, Dorjee, S., Tshering, K. P., & Gredebäck, G. (2021). High quality social environment buffers infants’ cognitive development from poor maternal mental health: Evidence from a study in Bhutan. Developmental Science, e13203. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.13203 (.PDF)

  17. Gredebäck, G., Haas, S., Hall, J., Pollak, S., Karakus, D. C., & Lindskog, M. (2021). Social cognition in refugee children: an experimental cross‑sectional study of emotional processing with Syrian families in Turkish communities. Royal Society Open Science, 8(8), 210362. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.210362 (.PDF)

  18. Millroth, P., Juslin, P., Winman, A., Nilsson, H., & Lindskog, M. (2020). Preference or ability: Exploring the relations between risk preference, personality, and cognitive abilities. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.2171 (.PDF)

  19. Astor, K., Lindskog, M., Forssman, L., Kenward, B., Fransson, M., Skalkidou, A., Tharner, A., Cassé, J., & Gredebäck, G. (2020). Social and emotional contexts predict the development of gaze following in early infancy. Royal Society Open Science, 7(9), 201178. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.201178 (.PDF)

  20. Schröder,, E., Gredebäck, G., Gunnarsson, J., & Lindskog, M. (2019). Play Enhances Visual Perception in Infancy – an Active Training Study. Developmental Science.. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12923 (.PDF)

  21. Marciszko, M., Forssman, L., Kenward, B., Lindskog, M., Fransson, M., & Gredebäck, G. (2019). The social foundation of executive function. Developmental Science.23(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12924 (.PDF)

  22. Li, J., Zhou, X., & Lindskog, M. (2019). Editorial: Approximate Number System and Mathematics. Frontiers in Psychology - Cognition 10:2084. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02084.(.PDF)

  23. Gottwald, J., Gredebäck, G., & Lindskog, M. (2019). Two-step Actions in Infancy the TWAIN-model. Experimental Brain Research, 237(10), 2495-2503. doi.org/10.1007/s00221-019-05604-0(.PDF)

  24. Lindskog, M., Rogell, M., Kenward, B. & Gredebäck, G. (2019). Discrimination of Small Forms in a Deviant-Detection Paradigm by 10-month-old Infants. Frontiers in Psychology 10:1032. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01032. (.PDF)

  25. Bergh, R. & Lindskog. M. (2019).The Group-Motivated Sampler. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 148, 845-862. (Equal author contribution) (.PDF)

  26. Poom, L., Lindskog, M., Winman, A.,& van den Berg, R. (2019). Grouping effects in numerosity perception under prolonged viewing conditions. PLOS ONE 14(2) : e0207502. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0207502 (.PDF)

  27. Gredebäck, G., Lindskog, M., Juvrud, J., Green, D., & Marciszko, C. (2018). Action prediction allows hypothesis testing via internal forward models. Frontiers in Psychology 9:290. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00290 (.PDF)

  28. Kayhan, E., Gredebäck, G., & Lindskog, M. (2017). Infants distinguish between two events based on their relative likelihood. Child Development., 89(6), e507—e519. doi:10.1111/cdev.12970 (.PDF)

  29. van den Berg, R., Lindskog, M., Poom, L., & Winman, A. (2017). Recent is more: a negative time-order effect in non-symbolic numerical judgment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 43, 1084-1097.(.PDF)

  30. Eriksson, K., & Lindskog, M. (2017). Encoding of Numerical Information in Memory: Magnitude or Nominal? Journal of Numerical Cognition, 3, 58-76.(.PDF)

  31. Lindskog, M., Winman, A., & Poom, L. (2017). Individual differences in nonverbal number skills predict math anxiety. Cognition, 159, 156-162. (.PDF)

  32. Gottwald, J. M., de Bortoli Vizioli, A., Lindskog, M., Nystr ̈om, P., Ekberg, T., von Hofsten, C. & Gredebäck, G. (2017). Infants Prospectively Control Reaching Based on the Difficulty of Future Actions: To What Extent Can Infants? Multiple-Step Actions Be Explained by Fitts’ Law? Developmental Psychology, 53, 4-12.(.PDF)

  33. Lindskog, M., Winman, A., & Poom, L. (2016). Arithmetic training does not improve approximate number system acuity. Frontiers in Psychology, 7:1634. (.PDF)

  34. Gottwald, J. M., Achermann, S., Marciszko, C., Lindskog, M., & Gredebäck, G. (2016). An embodied account of early executive function development: Prospective motor control in infancy is related to inhibition and working memory. Psychological Science, 27, 1600-1610. (.PDF)

  35. Lindskog, M. & Winman, A. (2016). No evidence of learning in non-symbolic numerical tasks - A comment on Park & Brannon (2014). Cognition, 150, 243-251. (.PDF)

  36. Lindskog, M., Kerimi, N., Winman, A., & Juslin, P. (2015). A Swedish validation of the Berlin Numeracy test. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 56, 132-139. doi 10.1111/sjop.12189. (.PDF)

  37. Juslin, P., Lindskog, M., &, Mayerhofer, B. (2015). Is there something special with probabilities? - Insight vs. computational ability in multiple risk integration. Cognition, 136, 282-303. (.PDF)

  38. Lindskog, M. (2015). Where did that come from? – Identifying the source of a sample. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68, 499-522. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2014.959534. (.PDF)

  39. Winman, A., Juslin, P., Lindskog, M., Nilsson, H., & Kerimi, N. (2014). The role of ANS-acuity and Numeracy for the calibration and the coherence of subjective probability judgments. Frontiers in Psychology, 5:851. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00851. (.PDF)

  40. Lindskog, M., Winman, A., & Juslin, P. (2014). The association between higher education and approximate number system acuity. Frontiers in Psychology, 5:462. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00462. (.PDF)

  41. Lindskog, M. & Winman, A. (2014). Are all data created equal?- Exploring some boundary conditions for a lazy intuitive statistician. PLOS One, 9(5): e97686. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0097686. (.PDF)

  42. Lindskog, M., Winman, A., & Juslin, P. (2013). Calculate or wait: Is man an eager or a lazy intuitive statistician?, Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25, 994-1014. (.PDF)

  43. Lindskog, M., Winman, A., Juslin, P., & Poom, L. (2013). Measuring acuity of the Approximate Number System reliably and validly: The evaluation of an adaptive test procedure. Frontiers in Cognition. 4:510. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00510. (.PDF)

  44. Lindskog M., Winman A., & Juslin P. (2013) Are there rapid feedback effects on Approximate Number System acuity? Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 7:270. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00270. (.PDF)

  45. Lindskog, M., Winman, A., & Juslin, P. (2013). Näıve point estimation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39, 782-800. doi:10.1037/a0029670. (.PDF)

  46. Lindskog, M., Winman, A., & Juslin, P. (2013). Is it time Bayes went fishing? Bayesian probabilistic reasoning in a category learning task. In M. Knauff, M. Pauen, N. Sebanz, & I. Wachsmuth (Eds.), Proceedings of the 35th annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 906-911). Presented at the The 35th annual conference of the cognitive science society, Berlin..PDF)

  47. Lindskog, M., Winman, A., & Juslin, P. (2013). Effects of response and presentation format on measures of approximate number system acuity. In M. Knauff, M. Pauen, N. Sebanz, & I. Wachsmuth (Eds.), Proceedings of the 35th annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 2908-2913). Presented at the The 35th annual conference of the cognitive science society, Berlin.Journal Articles (.PDF)

  48. Juslin, P., Nilsson, H., Winman, A., & Lindskog, M. (2011). Reducing cognitive biases in probabilistic reasoning by the use of logarithm formats. Cognition, 120, 248-267. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2011.05.004. (.PDF)